A Framework for Belief Update
نویسنده
چکیده
Belief update and reasoning about actions are two well studied areas of research about the evolution of knowledge over time. The similarities between these two fields have already been pointed out by some researchers: for example del Val and Shoham [4] use a theory of action to derive a semantics for belief update; Li and Pereira [8] use a Ginsberg-like semantics for updating a theory of actions. In this paper we present a very simple action description language [6] with narratives that allows expressing several different update semantics. The basic principles of this language has already been investigated in the literature. Indeed, the basic semantics of this language can be seen as a proper restriction of the language L by Baral et al. [1]. What is new in this paper is not the language itself, but rather the way it is able to express update semantics. To introduce the language, we consider an example similar to the evergreen Yale Shooting Problem.
منابع مشابه
A Unified Framework of Propositional Knowledge Base Revision and Update Based on State Transition Models
Belief revision and belief update are two of the most basic types of belief change operations. We need to select either revision or update when we accept new information into the current belief, however, such decision making has not been considered. In this paper, we propose a unified framework of revision and update based on state transition models that enable us to do such decision making. Th...
متن کاملPlato's Cave in the Dempster-Shafer land-the Link between Pignistic and Plausibility Transformations
In reasoning under uncertainty in AI, there are (at least) two useful and different ways of understanding beliefs: the first is as absolute belief or degree of belief in propositions and the second is as belief update or measure of change in belief. Pignistic and plausibility transformations are two wellknown probability transformations that map belief functions to probability functions in the ...
متن کاملA conceptual framework for (iterated) revision, update, and nonmonotonic reasoning
This paper makes a foundational contribution to the discussions on the very nature of belief change operations. Belief revision and belief update are investigated within an abstract framework of epistemic states and (qualitative or quantitative) conditionals. Moreover, we distinguish between background knowledge and contextual information in order to analyse belief change more appropriately. Th...
متن کاملA Knowledge-Based Framework for Belief Change, Part II: Revision and Update
The study of belief change has been an active area in philosophy and AI. In recent years two special cases of belief change, belief revision and belief update, have been studied in detail. In a companion paper FH94b] we introduced a new framework to model belief change. This framework combines temporal and epistemic modalities with a notion of plausibility, allowing us to examine the changes of...
متن کاملA Unified View of Belief Revision and Update
Belief revision and belief update have been considered as two distinct types of belief mod-iication. In this paper, we show that both can be captured within an uniied formalism, in which revision is encoded as update of the mental state. Speciically, we show that the framework for belief update presented in 6, 7] can be used to capture revision as well, by extending the underlying language to i...
متن کاملA Uniied View of Belief Revision and Update
Belief revision and belief update have been considered as two distinct types of belief mod-iication. In this paper, we show that both can be captured within an uniied formalism, in which revision is encoded as update of the mental state. Speciically, we show that the framework for belief update presented in 6, 7] can be used to capture revision as well, by extending the underlying language to i...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2000